2022
van Dongen, Emanuel; Raaijmakers, Steven
The Development of Moral Reasoning in the Law Curriculum - An Exploration of Various Teaching Activities Journal Article
In: Law and Method, vol. March, pp. 1-16, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {The Development of Moral Reasoning in the Law Curriculum - An Exploration of Various Teaching Activities},
author = {Emanuel van Dongen and Steven Raaijmakers},
doi = {10.5553/REM/.000066},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-01},
journal = {Law and Method},
volume = {March},
pages = {1-16},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2021
Giesen, Ivo; van Dongen, Emanuel
Over het "normaal maatschappelijke risico" of "normale bedrijfsrisico" bij schade door politie-invallen Book Chapter
In: L. Dalhuisen E.R. de Jong, T. Bouwman & I. Giesen (Ed.): pp. 115-132, Boom juridisch, 2021, ISBN: 9789462909939.
@inbook{nokey,
title = {Over het "normaal maatschappelijke risico" of "normale bedrijfsrisico" bij schade door politie-invallen},
author = {Ivo Giesen and Emanuel van Dongen},
editor = {E.R. de Jong, L. Dalhuisen, T. Bouwman & I. Giesen},
isbn = {9789462909939},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-11-04},
urldate = {2021-11-04},
pages = {115-132},
publisher = {Boom juridisch},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
van Eijken, Hanneke; Terlouw, Ashley
In: Conflictoplossing: het domein van rechters?, Chapter 12, pp. 279-301, Wolters Kluwer, 2021, ISBN: 9789013165340.
@inbook{nokey,
title = {Behoort conflictoplossing in het vreemdelingenrecht per definitie tot domein van de rechter? Een inventarisatie van alternatieve vormen van conflictoplossing in het vreemdelingenrecht},
author = {Hanneke van Eijken and Ashley Terlouw},
url = {https://elsacademy.nl/en/van-eijken-en-terlouw/},
isbn = {9789013165340},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-08-13},
booktitle = {Conflictoplossing: het domein van rechters?},
pages = {279-301},
publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},
chapter = {12},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
van den Bos, Kees
Inleiding empirische rechtswetenschap Book
Boom juridisch, 2021, ISBN: 9789462908550.
@book{vandenbos2021,
title = {Inleiding empirische rechtswetenschap},
author = {Kees van den Bos},
url = {https://www.boomdenhaag.nl/webshop/inleiding-empirische-rechtswetenschap},
isbn = {9789462908550},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-05-01},
urldate = {2021-05-01},
publisher = {Boom juridisch},
abstract = {In het juridische domein bestaat steeds meer interesse voor empirisch onderzoek. Moderne rechtenstudenten vragen zich af of, en hoe, ze dit kunnen leren. Docenten willen dit goed en toegankelijk aan hun studenten overbrengen. Promovendi en andere rechtswetenschappers overwegen dit in hun onderzoeksprojecten te betrekken. Praktijkjuristen moeten voor hun beroep steeds vaker empirische onderzoeksbevindingen kunnen duiden.
Deze inleiding in de empirische rechtswetenschap geeft lezers de basiskennis over empirisch-juridisch onderzoek. Een degelijk en toegankelijk Nederlands studieboek zonder statistische formules dat op een activerende en stimulerende wijze aangeeft waar je bij empirisch onderzoek in de praktijk op moet letten.
Belangrijke onderzoeksmethoden zoals interviews, vragenlijsten en experimenten worden besproken. Oefeningen in elk hoofdstuk zorgen ervoor dat je de stof echt gaat beheersen. Tezamen leiden deze oefeningen tot een onderzoeksvoorstel voor je eigen empirisch-juridische onderzoek.
Het boek kan in diverse vormen van onderwijs worden gebruikt (van Bachelor- tot postdoctoraal niveau). Het kan ook zelfstandig worden doorgenomen. De beknopte inleiding kan gemakkelijk gecombineerd worden met aanvullend materiaal. In elk hoofdstuk worden hiertoe diverse literatuursuggesties gegeven.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
In het juridische domein bestaat steeds meer interesse voor empirisch onderzoek. Moderne rechtenstudenten vragen zich af of, en hoe, ze dit kunnen leren. Docenten willen dit goed en toegankelijk aan hun studenten overbrengen. Promovendi en andere rechtswetenschappers overwegen dit in hun onderzoeksprojecten te betrekken. Praktijkjuristen moeten voor hun beroep steeds vaker empirische onderzoeksbevindingen kunnen duiden.
Deze inleiding in de empirische rechtswetenschap geeft lezers de basiskennis over empirisch-juridisch onderzoek. Een degelijk en toegankelijk Nederlands studieboek zonder statistische formules dat op een activerende en stimulerende wijze aangeeft waar je bij empirisch onderzoek in de praktijk op moet letten.
Belangrijke onderzoeksmethoden zoals interviews, vragenlijsten en experimenten worden besproken. Oefeningen in elk hoofdstuk zorgen ervoor dat je de stof echt gaat beheersen. Tezamen leiden deze oefeningen tot een onderzoeksvoorstel voor je eigen empirisch-juridische onderzoek.
Het boek kan in diverse vormen van onderwijs worden gebruikt (van Bachelor- tot postdoctoraal niveau). Het kan ook zelfstandig worden doorgenomen. De beknopte inleiding kan gemakkelijk gecombineerd worden met aanvullend materiaal. In elk hoofdstuk worden hiertoe diverse literatuursuggesties gegeven.
Deze inleiding in de empirische rechtswetenschap geeft lezers de basiskennis over empirisch-juridisch onderzoek. Een degelijk en toegankelijk Nederlands studieboek zonder statistische formules dat op een activerende en stimulerende wijze aangeeft waar je bij empirisch onderzoek in de praktijk op moet letten.
Belangrijke onderzoeksmethoden zoals interviews, vragenlijsten en experimenten worden besproken. Oefeningen in elk hoofdstuk zorgen ervoor dat je de stof echt gaat beheersen. Tezamen leiden deze oefeningen tot een onderzoeksvoorstel voor je eigen empirisch-juridische onderzoek.
Het boek kan in diverse vormen van onderwijs worden gebruikt (van Bachelor- tot postdoctoraal niveau). Het kan ook zelfstandig worden doorgenomen. De beknopte inleiding kan gemakkelijk gecombineerd worden met aanvullend materiaal. In elk hoofdstuk worden hiertoe diverse literatuursuggesties gegeven.
Bekker, Sonja
Hardening and softening of country-specific recommendations in the European Semester Journal Article
In: West European Politics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 114-133, 2021.
@article{doi:10.1080/01402382.2020.1739407,
title = {Hardening and softening of country-specific recommendations in the European Semester},
author = {Sonja Bekker},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1739407},
doi = {10.1080/01402382.2020.1739407},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
urldate = {2021-01-01},
journal = {West European Politics},
volume = {44},
number = {1},
pages = {114-133},
publisher = {Routledge},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2020
van den Bos, Kees
Empirical Legal Research. A Primer Book
Edward Elgar, 2020, ISBN: 9781789907209.
@book{vandenBos2020,
title = {Empirical Legal Research. A Primer},
author = {Kees van den Bos},
url = {https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/empirical-legal-research-9781789907223.html},
isbn = {9781789907209},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
urldate = {2020-01-01},
publisher = {Edward Elgar},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Ansems, Lisa F. M.; Bos, Kees; Mak, Elaine
Speaking of Justice: A Qualitative Interview Study on Perceived Procedural Justice Among Defendants in Dutch Criminal Cases Journal Article
In: Law & Society Review, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 643-679, 2020.
@article{https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12499,
title = {Speaking of Justice: A Qualitative Interview Study on Perceived Procedural Justice Among Defendants in Dutch Criminal Cases},
author = {Lisa F. M. Ansems and Kees Bos and Elaine Mak},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lasr.12499},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12499},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
urldate = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Law & Society Review},
volume = {54},
number = {3},
pages = {643-679},
abstract = {Qualitative interviews with one hundred defendants in Dutch criminal cases examine whether perceived procedural justice is a relevant concern for defendants, and, if so, which procedural justice components they refer to. The study provides a point of epistemological departure from the quantitative studies dominating the field, as it assessed which components of procedural justice (if any) respondents put forward themselves rather than asking about predetermined procedural justice components. The large majority of respondents mentioned procedural justice issues themselves, and six components were at the core of their procedural justice perceptions: (1) information on which decisions are based, (2) interpersonal treatment, (3) due consideration, (4) neutrality, (5) voice, and (6) accuracy. Although these procedural justice components largely correspond with the literature, respondents thus mentioned some components more often, and others less often, than the literature would suggest. In particular, neutrality plays an important role in the Dutch legal context examined here.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Qualitative interviews with one hundred defendants in Dutch criminal cases examine whether perceived procedural justice is a relevant concern for defendants, and, if so, which procedural justice components they refer to. The study provides a point of epistemological departure from the quantitative studies dominating the field, as it assessed which components of procedural justice (if any) respondents put forward themselves rather than asking about predetermined procedural justice components. The large majority of respondents mentioned procedural justice issues themselves, and six components were at the core of their procedural justice perceptions: (1) information on which decisions are based, (2) interpersonal treatment, (3) due consideration, (4) neutrality, (5) voice, and (6) accuracy. Although these procedural justice components largely correspond with the literature, respondents thus mentioned some components more often, and others less often, than the literature would suggest. In particular, neutrality plays an important role in the Dutch legal context examined here.
2018
Grootelaar, Hilke A. M.; Bos, Kees
In: Law & Society Review, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 234-268, 2018.
@article{https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12315,
title = {How Litigants in Dutch Courtrooms Come to Trust Judges: The Role of Perceived Procedural Justice, Outcome Favorability, and Other Sociolegal Moderators},
author = {Hilke A. M. Grootelaar and Kees Bos},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lasr.12315},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12315},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
urldate = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Law & Society Review},
volume = {52},
number = {1},
pages = {234-268},
abstract = {This paper examines the hypothesis that litigants' perceived procedural justice is positively associated with their trust in judges. We argue that although this association might seem quite robust, it can vary across contexts. In particular, we suggest that the nature and magnitude of the association between procedural justice and trust in judges depends on outcome concerns, and other sociolegal moderators such as outcome importance and prior court experience. We tested our predictions in three different types of law cases among 483 litigants at court hearings of the district court of the Mid-Netherlands. As predicted, our results indicate that perceived procedural justice was positively associated with trust in judges when outcomes were relatively favorable, and that this association was even stronger when outcomes were relatively unfavorable. The courtroom context studied here enabled us to explore how other sociolegal variables moderated these relationships.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This paper examines the hypothesis that litigants' perceived procedural justice is positively associated with their trust in judges. We argue that although this association might seem quite robust, it can vary across contexts. In particular, we suggest that the nature and magnitude of the association between procedural justice and trust in judges depends on outcome concerns, and other sociolegal moderators such as outcome importance and prior court experience. We tested our predictions in three different types of law cases among 483 litigants at court hearings of the district court of the Mid-Netherlands. As predicted, our results indicate that perceived procedural justice was positively associated with trust in judges when outcomes were relatively favorable, and that this association was even stronger when outcomes were relatively unfavorable. The courtroom context studied here enabled us to explore how other sociolegal variables moderated these relationships.